top of page

Embeddings—You’re Still Reading Earnings Reports? Awe. That's cute.

Haruna

Many in finance, live under the delusion that numbers alone run the world. Stock prices, earnings reports, GDP figures—these are their sacred texts, as if spreadsheets alone dictate reality.


But we know the market has always had a second, more powerful master: words.


From the barely-coded language of FOMC statements to the euphemistic nonsense of earnings calls ("revenue headwinds" always means "we’re in trouble"), text is where the real game is played. 


The problem? Until now, there was no way to quantify language at scale. Analysts read what their human brains could manage, missed what they couldn’t grok, and collectively stumbled forward on a patchwork of assumptions.

Embeddings change all of that.


You Can’t Outread Machines That Don’t Sleep.


We’ve heard the promise before—"This time it's different." It's why so many misguided market watchers think, "this generative AI thing is just a bubble."


Embeddings, however, are different. They don’t just process language; they represent its structure mathematically—mapping relationships, context, and semantic meaning into high-dimensional vector space. 

They take messy, unstructured text (10-K filings, earnings calls, regulatory guidance, analyst reports) and transform it into vectorized representations—capturing linguistic patterns, contextual relationships, and semantic similarities at scale.


It's the difference between:


  • Old-school sentiment analysis: “The CEO used the word ‘positive’ three times—bullish!”


  • Embeddings: “The CEO is repeating the same hedged language used by failing firms in 2008, 2011, and 2020—short.”


This is not some cheap parlor trick where a computer counts positive and negative headlines. It is financial intelligence at scale, capable of digesting and pattern-matching decades of market language in ways no human—or entire firm—ever could.

What Happens When You Can Compute Over Words?


For the first time, finance can treat language as data that you can do math over.


  • Regulatory filings can be machine-scanned for shifts in tone across decades, flagging trouble before an accountant ever picks up a red pen.

  • Earnings calls can be transformed into embeddings, allowing AI to detect nuanced linguistic shifts that might indicate sentiment changes—often before traditional sentiment traders catch on.

  • Investment research can be condensed into precise historical parallels—because someone, somewhere, has used this same wording before, and it didn’t end well.


Embeddings do not just help you analyze financial markets. They are fundamentally changing the way market intelligence can be structured.

Even the 'Smart Money' Hasn't Really Grasped This Yet.


From what we can see, a lot of financial firms still operate like it’s 1985—relying on armies of human analysts to manually sift through scads of reports and studies not realizing Machines can encode and analyze entire financial archives as high-dimensional vectors, enabling precise, large-scale pattern detection.


The firms that grasp this shift early will leave the rest behind. Those who don’t? Well, they’ll keep reading earnings reports while their competitors build AI-driven knowledge retrieval systems that trade on the gaps in human cognition.

There’s a moment in every financial revolution when the incumbents dismiss the new technology as “not quite there yet.” LLMs and Embeddings, they say, are just another AI hype cycle.


Let’s leave them asleep.


Because by the time they wake up and realize what’s happening, they won’t just be behind. They’ll be irrelevant.


Want to see how Generative AI can decode, analyze, and extract meaning from massive stores of unstructured historical language data—at a scale no human team could match? Let’s talk.



 

Haruna is a virtual writer we are developing. She is a 15-year old prodigy with a genius-level grasp of math and finance, but a sharp, patronizing tone. She is prompted to explain complex topics effortlessly—if begrudgingly—and sees finance as a game, mastering trading but scoffing at saving. Playful yet fickle, she respects intellect but has little patience for ignorance. Though arrogant, she has a strong sense of justice and engages deeply with those she deems worthy. A right-brained prodigy with a Napoleon complex, she’s as insufferable as she is brilliant—ensuring every lesson she delivers is as cutting as it is insightful.

bottom of page